When considering an upgrade to a wireless electronic groupset, SRAM’s eTap AXS series offers compelling options. Among these, the Rival eTap AXS [paid link] and Force eTap AXS stand out for their balance of performance and value.
This guide delves into the distinctions between these two groupsets, focusing on aspects like weight, materials, compatibility, and overall performance to assist you in making an informed decision.
Material Composition and Weight
The primary differences between Rival and Force eTap AXS lie in their materials and resulting weight.
- Crankset: Rival utilizes aluminum crank arms, contributing to a heavier setup. In contrast, Force employs carbon fiber crank arms, reducing weight and potentially enhancing stiffness.
- Derailleurs: Rival’s derailleurs are constructed with more aluminum and steel components, while Force incorporates carbon fiber and magnesium, leading to a lighter assembly.
- Overall Weight: A complete Rival eTap AXS [paid link] groupset weighs approximately 3,155 grams, whereas Force eTap AXS comes in around 2,750 grams.
Shifting Performance and Ergonomics
Both groupsets offer precise and reliable shifting, thanks to SRAM’s eTap AXS technology. However, there are subtle differences in ergonomics and features:
- Shifter Design: Rival shifters have a slightly bulkier hood shape and lack the contact point adjustment found in Force shifters.
- Brake Modulation: Force shifters provide more refined brake modulation due to their adjustable reach and contact point settings, catering to riders seeking a customized feel.
Brake System Differences
Both Rival and Force eTap AXS are available exclusively with hydraulic disc brakes. However, Force offers additional features:
- Contact Point Adjustment: Force brake levers allow for fine-tuning of the brake pad contact point, enabling riders to personalize lever feel.
- Brake Calipers: Force calipers are marginally lighter and may offer improved heat dissipation due to material differences.
Power Meter Integration
Power measurement capabilities differ between the two groupsets:
- Rival: Offers a single-sided power meter integrated into the left crank arm, providing an accessible entry point for power-based training.
- Force: Features a dual-sided power meter option, offering more comprehensive data for riders seeking detailed performance metrics.
Compatibility and Customization
Both groupsets are part of the AXS ecosystem, ensuring cross-compatibility:
- Component Mixing: Riders can mix and match components from Rival, Force, and even Red eTap AXS [paid link], allowing for tailored setups based on performance and budget considerations.
- Blip Integration: Force shifters support the addition of Blips (remote shifters), enhancing versatility for various riding positions. Rival shifters lack this feature.
Price Considerations
Budget plays a significant role in component selection:
- Rival eTap AXS [paid link]: Approximately $1,400 for a complete groupset, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious riders seeking wireless electronic shifting.
- Force eTap AXS: Around $2,100 for a complete groupset, reflecting the use of premium materials and additional features.
Conclusion
Choosing between SRAM Rival eTap AXS and Force eTap AXS depends on individual priorities:
- Opt for Rival eTap AXS if you seek reliable wireless shifting at a more accessible price point, and can forgo certain ergonomic adjustments and weight savings.
- Choose Force eTap AXS if you desire a lighter setup with enhanced customization options, including adjustable shifters and dual-sided power measurement.
Both groupsets deliver high-quality performance, ensuring that riders can select the option that best aligns with their cycling goals and budget.
For a visual comparison and further insights, consider watching the following video: